Williams Center Art Gallery

Sheltered January 6–30, 2005
Guest curator, Paul Felder

Shelter from hostile elements is a fundamental natural need. From the fibrous husk of the coconut to the flexible skin of the human, from the mathematical elegance of the snail shell to the turreted confusion of the McMansion, many types of physical shelters have evolved. The evolution of the emotional shelter may be less obvious, though human beings work to protect themselves from psychic as well as physical peril. The bomb shelter and voice mail are two modern examples of efforts to keep personal interaction at a cautious distance. The exhibition presents 20 artists’ undertanding and exploration of the need for shelter as it touches all aspects of life.

artists in the exhibition
page 1: |Paul Felder: curator's statement
| Kathy Bruce | Matthew Daub| Patricia Goodrich | Debbie Heeps | William Hudders |
page 2: | Amy W. Hufnagel | Eve Ingalls | Harry Lynn Krizan | Virginia Maksymowicz| Monica C. Nohr |

page 3: | Jill Peckelun | Heather Phillips | Matt Povse | George Shortess | Herbert Simon |
page 4: | Krista Steinke & Sherman Finch | Shirley Thomas | Blaise Tobia | Ven Voisey |Art 215 students |

Paul Felder
A Guide for Viewing Sheltered

What does some of this work have to do with shelter?

Many of the works provide direct experiences of physical shelter: a tenement, nest, ceramic object that could have housed primitive peoples or seekers of some sort of futurist utopia. They are here because I found them in a way beautiful, or satisfying, and responsive to the chosen theme.

Others are more problematic: an ironing board with needles, an orifice within which one may drop a confession, a headless torso. These address not shelter itself, but our need for it. We must defend it. We must have a place of refuge, not just for our bodies, but for our sins. If we are naked and exposed, we are vulnerable; perhaps we are in danger.

Or maybe I have everything backwards. Maybe the tenement is about menace, about who is lurking on the third-floor stairs, and the ironing board is as good a place as any to hide under, if it’s raining. Physical shelter, psychological shelter—maybe there’s not that much difference.

Should I try to understand the works before I read the artist’s statement?

Let’s be honest here: sometimes the artist’s statement is better than the work. Besides, if the artist has written a statement and the curator has put it in the exhibit, isn’t it part of the work itself? When Ven Voissey writes in the proposal for A Blanket of Self-Defilement, “I would like to burn this piece at the end of the exhibition,” isn’t he adding immeasurably to the experience of looking at his blanket?

Blaise Tobia’s elegant conceptual work is similarly enhanced by the written word. Assembled Images: Alpha and Omega may be visually satisfying in itself, yet how much richer is the experience of viewing it with an understanding of what it represents: one of the oldest and one of the most recent human habitations on earth. 

We need the words, sometimes. If this exhibit has an underlying message, it is that shelter is best appreciated when both hemispheres of our brains are engaged.

Art, like life itself, is frequently inscrutable, and too often meaningless. You can put the pieces together however you like, but if someone provides an instruction manual, shouldn’t you look at it before starting to assemble?

What am I to make of Giampaolo Has a Cold and It Is Raining On and Off?

These paintings, Matthew Daub writes, recall my experiences while “sheltered” in an Italian hotel during a week-long rainstorm…Like memory, the paintings become a connection of fragmented elements; some obscure and some concrete.

Not unlike memory, perhaps, our notion of shelter may become a connection of fragmented elements; some physical and some psychological, and some, without question, more obscure than others.

P.F.

Easton, Pennsylvania
January 2005

Paul Felder is an architect, planner, and educator. He is a principal in The Architectural Studio, a nationally recognized Easton-based firm he founded in 1974. His recent works include Saint Pio Cultural Centre in Barto, Pennsylvania, and Henry A. Ahnert Jr. Alumni Center, East Stroudsburg University. He has taught architectural design and planning at Pennsylvania State University and Lehigh University, and is an adjunct faculty member at Lafayette College. Felder presented “Post-Freudian Modernism: The Failure of Architecture in the 20th Century” at the 2000 meeting of the American Institute of Architects.

Kathy Bruce 

Amour Is Armor, Armor Is Amour, 2004
Wire, fencing, wood
54 x 23 x 31 inches

 

 

 

Armor: 1. a protective metal covering to protect from bullets or missiles. 2. a natural protective covering, for example, a shell.

Shell: 5. hard casing or covering that protects or holds its contents, or the material composing it.

Amour: a love affair, especially one that is clandestine.

When viewing the sculpture, imagine yourself within the armor. The concept for the work is based on metaphor and the word play of armor—a layer of protective wear—and amour—love. Everyone knows that love can be psychologically damaging. Is it possible for the transparent armor to protect/shelter the figure within from sustaining the possible damage inflicted by amour? This piece explores how it is not an accident that the two words armor and amour are practically identical, thus: considering armor as a type of psychological shelter/protection from amour.

K.B.

Matthew Daub


It Is Raining On and Off, 2004
Watercolor
36 x 46 inches (illus.)

Giampaolo Has a Cold, 2004
Watercolor
36 x 46 inches

These paintings recall my experiences while “sheltered” in an Italian hotel during a weeklong rainstorm. The text is culled directly from my travel journals, although presented out of context. The imbedded representational images are based on my plein air paintings done on site. The nonobjective passages are painted intuitively; they are not the result of some preordained design plan. As the process evolves, one mark or wash suggested the next. Like memory, the paintings become a connection of fragmented elements; some obscure and some concrete.

M.D


Patricia Goodrich



Homeguard series:
Standing Guard
, 2000-01
Mixed media
34 x 38 x 22 inches (lllus. above)

Refugee, 1999
Mixed media: wood, concrete, steel
44 x 12 x 12 inches

 

Standing Guard is one of 10 works from the “Homeguard” series, an arsenal representing how women not only keep, but also protect home. Each piece reflects women keeping home and family safe. The weaponry is homemade.

Standing Guard is constructed of a child’s ironing board and bread from which safety pins, crochet hooks, thimbles, and knitting needles protrude like long thorns. Inspired by the artist’s grandmother, who raised chickens and baked bread, and the Slovenian relatives to whom we sent clothes and from whom we received hand crocheted and embroidered linens, this work goes beyond one family. We are the rising bread; we are creative and creators; we give life and protect.

P.G.

 


Debbie Heeps


Under the Boardwalk, 2004
Quilt, fiber
43 x 42 inches

 


A home is a safe haven providing a physical barrier from outside elements and an enclosed space of emotional comfort. The architectural images of structure and pathways convey the memories of security and comfort when I journey home. The warm, pure colors indicate the emotional protection within the interior walls.

D.H.

William Hudders



Open Window, 1998
Oil on canvas
82 x 74 inches

 

 

 

To paint from life is a way to investigate the nature of appearances. I am not trying to create representational images but rather an interpretation of what I see filtered through the medium of paint. The act of translating visual information is the process I find most rewarding and stimulating in making a successful painting. While I am most interested in a realistic depiction of objects and landscapes, the behavior of the paint on the canvas and the balance of light is the more elusive element. The result is a collaboration of my painting combined with the surrounding visual stimulus; the painting is a record of the process of painting and a symbol of that collaboration.

To me these paintings are primarily visual documents, the meanings and purpose of which are entirely visual. There is no literal explanation. I have chosen imagery, which has a wide array of connotations and meanings. I am not trying to be willfully obscure; I am using a language without a direct verbal parallel. I am trying to create images whose meaning is not immediately clear. Ideally this should allow for a gradual period of thought and investigation, a chance to explore the image with more depth and attention. The understanding of the painting is fully contained within the act of looking.

W.H.

 

  top
return to Williams Center Gallery main page

Updated March 6, 2005



  © Lafayette College - Terms